andrewt.net

blog

How To Write Badly Wells

Chapter 27: The Taking of Toast in my Living Room

That morning, I awoke on my sofa. It had been three days since the cylinders had landed from Mars. I went to my window, and saw the hill where the Post Office stood, where one could buy envelopes in three colours and five sizes, although they had never stocked an A4 envelope in pink, for no reason I could fathom. Through the valley north of the hill runs a small stream, often teeming with fish, which played no part in the events surrounding the Martian invasion.

The Post Office was gone now, as was much of the village it had served, destroyed, I presumed, by the Martians during the night. My presumption is necessitated by the deep but fitful sleep I had taken, which prevented me from observing the methods used by the invaders, nor whether any man, woman or child escaped from the village unharmed. Indeed, the destruction may have been caused by a runaway house fire. Nevertheless, that afternoon, as I took toast (three slices, lightly buttered, golden brown, with no marmalade as only that encompassing detestable strips of zest remained) in the living room, a large cuboid space within my home, wherein a three-piece suite and several small cushions with a floral design are kept, a platoon of soldiers, attracted by the light of my home, came knocking at my door.

“What is your name?” asked one.

“Are you here about the men from Mars?” I replied, needlessly evading the straightforward question. “I’m afraid I know little of them.”

“What is your name?” the soldier repeated.

“They are giant brutes, and ugly. Think of them as a milking stool, but from Mars, and armed with a heat ray of unknown design, and instead of a milking stool there is an alien marching machine.”

“What is your name?”

“I am sorry, I am tired,” I explained, and retired to my living room to finish my toast. The soldiers marched off with a view to destroy the alien interlopers, however I did not follow them and do not know what became of them, nor did I speak with them for long enough to establish their character.

As I re-entered the living room, I noticed that another window had been smashed during the night, leaving six thousand, four hundred and nine shards of glass on my carpet, I later counted, instead of making any attempt to discover the source of the village’s destruction or the fate of my erstwhile interlocutor. I resolved that later that day I would run away from this place, to another small village of no consequence, which I could describe to you exactly without hindrance from Mars, nor being troubled by any unwanted learnings about the Martians’ ways, looks or number. I was poised to set off immediately, but instead I told myself I would have another night at my own abode, including several more rounds of toast, which I shall describe in equal or greater detail in the coming chapters.

I learned, much later, that the Martians had been repelled back to their own wandering point of light in the East sky, by human agents unknown. So relieved would I be by this news that any desire for clarification or details was quashed. But I did not know that as I began my rest, nor as I set off on my long, repetitive, and ultimately pointless journey.

Do Popemobiles really protect you from bullets?

I would say that this problem of being shot cannot be overcome by the distribution of bulletproof, 2″-thick armoured glass Popemobiles: on the contrary, they increase it. The solution must have two elements: firstly, bringing out the human dimension of guns, that is to say a spiritual and human renewal that would bring with it a new way of behaving towards others, and secondly, true friendship offered above all to those who are suffering, a willingness to make sacrifices and to practise self-denial, to be alongside the suffering.

Bulletproof glass Popemobiles are against God’s laws. Worse, the manufacturers of bulletproof glass Popemobiles deliberately add tiny holes that bullets can get through, in order to cause shootings in the Vatican.

The Weeping Manifesto

Because this particular combination of things is unlikely to ever become this topical for a third time, I’m posting a very slightly updated version of a sketch I wrote during series two of Newsjack and wasn’t used. You may draw your own conclusions as to why not:

PRESENTER:
You may have noticed David Tennant’s voice on Labour’s party election broadcasts. Tennant once branded Tory leader David Cameron “a regional newsreader who’ll jump on any bandwagon that flies past,” so we’ve invited Tennant and Cameron into the studio.

TENNANT:
Hello.

CAMERON:
Hello.

PRESENTER:
So first of all, David, what is it about the Conservatives you don’t like?

TENNANT:
Have you seen their manifesto? It’s terrifying. I mean, just look at it!

PRESENTER:
Where is it? All I can see is a statue of a weeping angel.

TENNANT:
Exactly!

PRESENTER:
Mr Cameron, how do you respond to this?

CAMERON:
You know, we’re not so different, David and I. I airbrushed my face, and he regenerated into a 27-year-old.

PRESENTER:
Okay. So David, you say—

TENNANT:
No! Keep looking at the manifesto! If you look away, it can move. See, you glanced at me then and it changed its position on tax breaks for married couples.

CAMERON:
Oh, don’t be so melodramatic. Our policies are not dangerous.

PRESENTER:
Alright then. Now, David, you said that Mr Cameron—

F/X: Suddenly, there is a gentle breeze blowing. a sheep baas in the distance

PRESENTER:
What happened? Where are we?

CAMERON:
1922.

PRESENTER:
What? How?

TENNANT:
I warned you! You have to keep a close eye on Conservative policies or you end up living in the 1920s.

PRESENTER:
Well, normally at this point I’d say that’s all we’ve got time for, but since we now have 88 years before our slot ends…

TENNANT:
Come on, I’ll give you a lift.

Wednesday’s Lottery Transcript

I had a meeting with Camelot, and unfortunately I’m not allowed to embed a YouTube clip, so here’s a full transcript of last night’s Lottery show:

ANNOUNCER:
On this Wednesday the 9th of September, on a five-minute delay from Lottery HQ, your mid-week host, Vernon Kay’s Old Hair!

OJ:
Thankyou, Al. Welcome to Wednesday’s National Lottery draw which literally no-one is watching. This evening’s draw team is up there watching out for spies from Channel 4, but before we start creating new winners, we have to tediously mention seven different Lottery-funded projects while pointedly not mentioning any bearded illusionists who may or may not be on the other side.

ANNOUNCER:
And for all the state-approved Lottery-related information, go to BBC online or press the red button.

OJ:
It’s as simple as that. And now for our first draw, which is of course Thunderball.

[graphic]

OJ:
And tonight’s draw team keeping a watchful eye on proceedings is drawmaster Matt Chamberlain, and independent adjudicator Andy Nyman. So Alan, please take it away and hopefully make somebody very rich.

ANNOUNCER:
Okay, let’s release those balls. We’re using set of balls 1 and Excalibur, chosen by Mike McCarthy from Newport. According to the draw team, over 22,000 tickets won a prize last week, of which 20,000 were held by one man. If some of that cash headed your way, congratulations and why the hell are you watching this?

OJ:
So, drawmaster Matt, are we good to go for tonight’s draw?

MATT:
Indeed we are.

OJ:
So is tonight going to be your lucky and in no way skill-assisted night? Let’s find out. Please, start the draw!

ANNOUNCER:
Here we go, then. Here’s the first one, it’s 34. Top of the shop in this game, of course. And the next one, it’s 13. And remember, you’d have a 1 in 13.9 million chance of predicting lottery numbers correctly, no matter how clever you are. And the next one, 15. And the fourth one is number nine. And the final ball from this machine is 24. Okay, now start the second machine and release the 14 red Thunderballs.

OJ:
And remember, if you’ve matched all the numbers drawn so far then (a) you still need this Thunderball to match and (b) I cannot stress enough that it’s a coincidence.

ANNOUNCER:
Here we go, then… It’s number 13 again. Which is a total coincidence. So here are tonight’s Thunderball numbers again, this time in ascending order: 9, 13, 15, 24 and number 34. And the Thunderball is 13. OJ!

OJ:
And it’s now time to go green for Wednesday’s Dream Number draw, which was carried out earlier this evening in front of our independent adjudicator, but that’s fine because nobody is attempting to predict it. Or play it.

ANNOUNCER:
Yep, we used Perido and set of balls number 4, which were chosen earlier today by Mike, and the dream number drawn was this one: 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6.

OJ:
And remember, if for whatever reason you’ve just joined us, that the proceeds from these draws are funding the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. And did you know that over 800,000 tonnes of soil were removed to create the construction platform?

ANNOUNCER:
Wow, OJ, that’s terrifically dull. I sure am glad this isn’t going out live on more than two or three channels.

OJ:
And with that, it’s time to play tonight’s Lotto.

[graphic]

OJ:
So, Al, how big is tonight’s jackpot?

ANNOUNCER:
Well, OJ, tonight’s jackpot has been estimated at two point four million — not two thousand — pounds! But don’t worry, you could only win that by coincidence.

OJ:
Fantastic. So, please take it away and do your mid-week thang!

ANNOUNCER:
Let’s release those big-money balls! And for tonight’s draw we’re using Merlin and set of balls number 1, chosen for us by Derren earlier this week. On Saturday, a total of seven tickets matched all six numbers, but we’re not expecting anyone to manage it this week.

OJ:
So, drawmaster Matt, are we ready to release tonight’s Lotto balls?

MATT:
Yes we are, OJ.

OJ:
I hope these next numbers are just what you’re looking for, unless you’re a psychological illusionist! Please, start the draw!

ANNOUNCER:
Right! I’d write these down if I was you. On a big bit of card, for preference. The first one, number 23. Lottery tickets have raised over £23 million for good causes. Next up, number 35. That one hasn’t come up in 48 draws, so it was due. And the third to be drawn… 11. The 11th of September is the start of Derren Brown’s new series. Here’s the next one! That’s number 28. Next out is number 39. On the 28th of February, Derren Brown will be 39 years old. And the last one is right there, it’s number 2. And 2 is the number of shots you’d need to composite to create the illusion of predicting lottery balls. The bonus tonight is number 15, so in ascending order, that’s 2, 11, 23, 28, 35 and 39. I hope you’re all keeping up if you’re writing this on card.

OJ:
Well, that’s it for this evening. Join us on Friday for another Euro-Millions draw, straight after Jonathan Ross and a repeat of Live At The Apollo which I suggest you all watch because there’s nothing good on any of the other channels, I’ve checked. Hope the numbers have been lucky for you (but not too lucky). Goodnight!

Dear Sir…

Dear Sir,

I am writing to complain about the joke on page 41 of The Bumper Book Of Children’s Jokes. The joke reads “Why are bakers stupid? Because they sell what they knead.” As a baker of some 31 years’ standing I am sure I need (not knead!) not remind you that kneading is a process involved in breadmaking entirely unrelated to needing. It is quite wrong to suggest that bakers are stupid.

However, please do not think we bakers do not have a sense of humour! Might I suggest that a better joke for your next edition might be “Why are bakers pragmatic and sensible? Because they sell what they knead to sell.”

Yours faithfully,

 

Caroline Jones

Association of Bakers

Nick Griffin Applies for EU Funding

I sent this to Newsjack. They didn’t use it. Given the reception Newsjack got I’m not sure how annoyed I really ought to feel about that. That’s not to say it was all bad by any means, but if it’s worse than the worst thing in Newsjack then I really shouldn’t show it to anyone ever. In any case, it’s sufficiently topical that I presume if I sit on it any longer it will cease to be any use to anyone, so here it is:

SPEAKER:
Welcome back everyone. And I see some new faces here today. Okay, first order of business is EU Funding Applications, and the first applicant is Mr Griffin of the British National Party.

GRIFFIN:
Thank you, Mr Speaker. We’d like to launch an advertising campaign for our Voluntary Repatriation Scheme. You can see we’ve already made a mock-up of our first poster. On the left here is an ethnic family looking unhappy on a rainy British Monday. The copy reads ‘are you fed up with Britain’s unfair PC council housing schemes, sponging immigrants, and racist politicians?’. Then over on the right of the poster, the same family is in the sun, with friends, smiling, and the copy reads ‘isn’t it time you went home?’. It’s all very wholesome.

SPEAKER:
Right. Are there any questions from the floor?

MAINSTREAM MEP:
Yes, I’ve noticed that in your ‘ethnic family’, the mother is Indian, the father is African, and two of the children are very obviously Chinese. Is that what you think ‘ethnic families’ look like?

GRIFFIN:
No, of course not. There is a good reason for that, and it should be clearer from our second poster. What we’ve done, to avoid offending anyone, is to invent a fictional country for this campaign. Bear in mind this is a work in progress, but you can see here that the same family is seen on a plane, enjoying a drink, and the strap-line above says ‘Why Don’t You Go Back To Darkistan?’ ’” that’s the name of our country ’” and in smaller letters at the bottom, so as not to alienate anyone, it says ‘or wherever it is that you people come from’.

MAINSTREAM MEP:
I would worry that that still might offend someone.

GRIFFIN:
You think people might see it as racist.

MAINSTREAM MEP:
That is a concern, yes.

GRIFFIN:
Can I remind you that I have been democratically elected to this Parliament by 1.4% of the British electorate?

SPEAKER:
And how much do you think this will cost?

GRIFFIN:
We’re applying for two million Euros, but obviously we’d prefer it in pounds.

SpringBiscuit

Another batch of NewsBiscuit submissions. As ever, one above the fold, rest below it. These are rather old, so the topical ones obviously no longer qualify as such. I think they’re all from March: I’ve not been writing much of this stuff for weeks now, mostly due to business, not being in the mood, and various other distractions. (And let’s face it: nobody ever won a mug by writing two items a month.)

Microsoft running ‘secret database program’ on millions of computers

There were fresh fears raised this week about online safety and privacy, as it emerged that software giant Microsoft had secretly installed a database program on millions of computers across the world, many in homes and businesses. The mysterious program, known only as ‘Access.exe’ is installed when the user first uses Microsoft Office, and hides among the regular components of Office. Although the program only came to light recently, it is thought that it may have been present on even early versions.

The program was found when Sarah Armstrong, a teacher in London, asked a friend for help with Excel and was shown the extra software hiding in the start menu. Immediately, she called other friends, who confirmed that they had ‘the Access program’ installed. Fearing the worst, she contacted Microsoft technical support and demanded to know why the program had been secretly installed on her computer. According to Armstrong, the support representative candidly told her ‘That’s our database program.’ Armstrong then asked ‘could you use Access to store people’s personal details and track their behaviour?’ and the representative said ‘yes’.

The Daily Express described the revelation as ‘just more evidence of what life is really like in Database Britain’. Microsoft has insisted that the public should not worry about Access, and that the program exists to help users control their own data, however when Armstrong contacted Microsoft demanding to see the information Access databases had about her, she was told that this was ‘impossible’.

Continue reading

FebruaryBiscuit

Here are my NewsBiscuit submissions for the last month. First, one that made the front page:

Now the others. Tip of the hat to anhodika for inspiring the first one and to Smudge for the headline on the second one. (Community site, see?)

Straw refuses to publish details of amendments to Freedom of Information Act

Following backlash against the scrapped publication of Parliamentary minutes from the run-up to the Iraq war, Jack Straw has announced that there will be a series of reforms to the current Freedom of Information Act. He promised reporters that the new Act would be more efficient and less easily circumvented, but he refused to divulge how this would be achieved or exactly what the proposals were.

Speaking on BBC Radio 7, he said that the new rules would stop politicians ‘publishing embarassing information in obscure places where it would be unlikely to be widely seen, such as Hansard or this show’. When asked where the information would instead be published, Straw looked puzzled, and after a pause said that the new proposals favoured openness but that the specifics of the proposals were not intended for public dissemination.

Straw went on to explain that while it is important that the public has a right to access information about government, that must be balanced with other concerns, such as security. ‘Of the nation?’ prompted the presenter, to which Straw replied, ‘well yes, obviously, but also of my job.’ When pressed for more information, he explained that ‘if the public know how to get information, then so do al-Qaeda, and that could pose serious threats.’ Instead, the government is set to bring in a replacement Act, whereby the public has a right to access large amounts of government information, including Parliamentary minutes and MPs’ expenses, but will not be told how to do so. He promised, however, that details of the process would be made freely available to anyone who asked to see them, as long as they submit their request in a correctly formatted letter to the new Information Commissioner’s office, whose address was also available on properly presented request.

The new Act is expected to come into force at the start of April, however Straw promised that information important to the public, such as war minutes and MPs’ expenses, would be covered by the new rules immediately ‘to aid transparency in government’.

Continue reading

JanuaryBiscuit

Here are my NewsBiscuit submissions for January 2009. There are quite a few, so I’ve put one to start off with, then the rest after the fold (i.e., a link at the bottom of the post). They are in no particular order, but they are shuffled to try to keep the Atheist Bus ones separate. (Atheist buses are a goldmine of comedy, I think, so I repeatedly tried different angles on it. I never came up with anything this good, though.)

Christian Scientists Split God

A group of Christian research scientists in Massachusetts announced this week that they had managed for the first time to split God, also known as the Higgs particle although mostly to annoy physicists, into his component parts. God is believed to have existed in the conditions immediately prior to the Big Bang.

They made the discovery using a machine called the Holy Smoke Chamber. A fragment of the True Cross was accelerated to 40% the speed of light and collided with a King James Bible. The 25m wide device is cooled by a constant stream of holy water. A team of 5 priests work round the clock blessing the inbound pipelines. Researchers were able to detect two of God’s components in the debris from the explosion.

According to Christian scientific theory, God is composed of three smaller particles called father, son and holy spirit. The trace from the Holy Smoke Chamber clearly shows a trail for the son particle, which curves gracefully through the chamber for five nanoseconds before ascending into heaven, more-or-less in line with the theory. The father particle’s trace, however, did not agree with calculated predictions. The researchers have admitted that the way the father particle moves is ‘mysterious’, but are confident an explanation will be found. The holy spirit particle was not observed. The Christian scientists believe that this particle passed clean through the chamber like a ghost.

Most Christian scientists agree that the father and son particles could tell us a lot about the universe if we can unlock their secrets. The experiments have been criticised by others, however, who claim that earlier work by Revelation et al suggests that recreating the son particle on earth could trigger a process known as ‘armageddon’, which potentially could wipe out life on Earth.

Continue reading

My NewsBiscuit Annual

From time to time I submit stuff to Newsbiscuit. More occasionally they use it. Their submission board is pretty awkward to work, though, so I thought I’d post my favourites on this blog also, where I can keep an eye on them. First, the ones they used:

(I do like my headlines-with-quotes-in.)

Next, some of the ones they didn’t. I’ll put most of them after the fold, since there are a lot of them. Also, some might be offensive if you’re easily offended. First, though, my favourite, from early to mid October:

Gordon Brown has new kitchen sink installed under anti-terrorism laws

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has had his kitchen refitted under laws brought in in the wake of the September 11th and July 7th terrorist attacks.

The refit was proposed in August, as part of a larger reorganisation of Number 10. Brown’s wife Sarah raised objections to the plans at an early stage, saying that the new system would make cooking difficult and that she didn’t like the colour. It seemed that the deadlock was unresolvable until September 17th, when the Prime Minister realised he could use existing anti-terror laws to push the installation through without first gaining his wife’s approval.

Critics have claimed that this is “a clear abuse” of the power handed to the PM’s office by these new rules. One backbench MP said that while he understood the need to have special new measures to deal with the new kind of threat faced today, the government had taken advantage of the fear to pass laws granting themselves more power than they had ever been elected to. Other recent applications of the anti-terror laws include freezing the assets of Iceland UK, resolving the double-booking of a conference room in Parliament, and the emergency resolution on Tuesday which mandated it was James’ turn to do the washing up.

Brown has insisted that neither he nor the government has abused the trust placed in them by Parliament, saying that there are “other kinds of terrorism” besides violent attacks on civilians, and that these might be said to include refusal to wash dishes or bad taste in kitchen units.

The House of Lords is expected to overturn the decision, but James Brown has said that as he’s already done the washing up, it’s too late to reverse the damage and a system must be put in place to prevent these situations from arising in the first place.

Continue reading